If the next one is running, its so crammed you cant get on. Hi! And it does an appalling job. But Paris: [Wiki, 2017] As to the rest of your post, it is pure econometric thinking of the kind that gives me a headache. As to the World Cup, I really dont think one should be obliged to design a mass transit system to cope with a once in ten or twenty year event. Even the Brits who have had to contend with such systems their entire life, get immensely irritated by it. The monthly pass users are the majority of transit users, at least in a city with good fares to encourage lots of people to use it. a healthy economy too. The kind of thing I imagined every time I travelled between the two mega-cities in the 80s and 90s. Notably the Tokyo is denser than Paris is a Phenomenon o the last 30 years according to the Atlas. For bigger cities, POP is appropriate. In the vast majority of cities, no excuse exists to have any kind of overt fare control. Japan has a norm of subsidized commuting costs (mostly employer subsidized, but the amount of government subsidy increases as income increases since it comes as a tax benefit), and while its cool that people can and do commute via Shinkansen from exurbs over 100km from the city center, I dont think that is behavior the government should promote. You may then be held in custody until you appear in front of the next available court. And life goes on. You know what you pay, and you wont get any surprises. Its response last week to the cancellation of so many Southern trains was to issue a new timetable, removing one in six of its trains. Non-car owners would be able to buy an annual pass. No one asking for M16s. The most common example of fare evasion involves the use of another persons Oyster Card to get the benefit of reduced or free travel. 24 Hour Emergency Contact 0207 837 3456 0207 837 3456, Home > Criminal Law > Fare Evasion Solicitors. It certainly helps the use of the Metro/RER, keeps car use low (you need to be slightly insane to try to drive in Paris; I did for the first year . New York itself may have an excuse to keep the faregates: its trains are very crowded, so peak-hour inspections may not be feasible. Ridership on those marginal branch lines was cratering before. Our recent trunk bus lines have open boarding and both Helsinki and Espoo have indicated to the regional authority that they want more open boarding. The system is a horrible mess seemingly designed to trap one into expense unless you choose conditions that are no ones first choice. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/other/atlas-urban-expansion-2016-edition. Software Merde! The whole situation was resolved very quickly in just over a week and much to my relief I received a warning for forgetting to tap in, rather than a prosecution and a criminal record. But thats Fare Evasion 201. In this context the metro is not totally out of place for German practice, just for bigger cities. I dont really know; admitting this makes me feel like one of those elites the Gilets Jaunes (and maybe Alon who had neither of these perks?) (slightly out of date; too lazy to update): > It is taking all the land area of Ile de France and ignoring that huge parts of it are either farmland (eg. There are likely to be cultural differences, so it is possible that in most American cities, it makes sense to have some POP officials. Incidentally, a follow up on that Letter to Ed from an Antipodean that I reported at the top of this blog. LegalAdviceUK exists to provide help for those in need of legal support in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. You focus on a small permanent presence where habitual evasion is common, and then focus your roaming enforcement on areas with a high CASUAL risk., which is why (in London) youll see periodic HIGHLY VISIBLE ticket check sweeps at big stations, or on services like the DLR or high-risk bus routes where there are a large number of POTENTIAL casual evaders. Rich people ride commuter rail, theyre not policed. One should also note that providing useful public transport service does not scale to the level of individual trips or trip lengths. The justification for this scheme has varied depending on who was asking, but the primary goal appears to be to defeat fare evasion. Charging thousands of pounds per year but travellers being forced to stand the entire (hour long) journey? The bottom line of the Pew study is that commuters who are able to use the Key pay one of the lowest per-trip costs among major transit agencies, while those who cant are forced to pay one of the highest fares a particularly egregious example of what many economists call the poor tax. Incidentally, another difference between HK & Singapore is that they are quite low-tax places, whereas France (and most EU) are high personal tax countries; one thus has a mentality that my taxes partly paid for this so one can start to resent paying excessively to use it as well. Though, dare I say, and FWIW, it also perfectly correlates with the Anglosphere In a country with a developed-country level of transit infrastructure, most travellers would not even look up the price before a trip. I concur, and Ive used London, NYC, HK, Tokyo, Shanghai, Moscow, Beijing amongst mega-city metro systems. @Henry: The Wiki section on France is truly pathetic (not worth publishing or reporting but I am sure it was): A 2009 study found that the share of immigrants in the population has no significant impact on crime rates once immigrants economic circumstances are controlled for, while finding that unemployed immigrants tend to commit more crimes than unemployed non-immigrants.[83] A study by sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar, director of studies at the EHESS, found that Muslims, mostly from North African origin, are becoming the most numerous group in [French prisons].[84][85] His work has been criticized for taking into account only 160 prisoners in 4 prisons, all close to northern Paris where most immigrants live. James provided an excellent service and put his excellent knowledge to help me get the best results in something that could have effected my whole professional and personal life in the UK. I find it quite plausible that ordinary people actually find fairness in pricing according to cost very attractive and well fair. Its probably one of the most American-friendly ways of encouraging more monthly distribution, since itd be hard to argue that employers shouldnt mitigate their employees commute impacts. The point is not to charge people to the largest amount you can, the point is to charge them the actual cost of their trip, in order to maximize global utility. 3) Is evasion hard (i.e. Have you noticed that the new boss of SNCF, Jean-Pierre Farandou, was formerly boss of French Keolis? On social fares, as on many other socioeconomic issues, it is useful for Americans to see how things work in countries with high income compression and low inequality under the aegis of center-left governments. Stores dont have gates. 4) If I do it, do I THINK Im likely to get caught?, The more yes answers they reach, the LESS LIKELY they are to do it. My solicitorhas been extremelyprofessional and his confidence has put my mind at rest. For example, some fringe party that wont make it to the Abgeordnetenhaus has election posters promising 30 monthlies, down from 86 today; BVG fare revenue was 766.3M in 2019, and the reduction, around 500M/year, is similar in scope to the size of the ongoing investment plan, around 2 km of city center subway or 3 km of suburban subway; the Berlin map I just posted has 24 km of new tunnel inside the Ring (ex-S21 bits already under construction) and 32 outside, so fare reduction subsidies are in competition with such expansion and should not be pursued. If an inspector (conductor) finds you without a ticket, you either pay a fine or get kicked off. Settling case out of court (fare evasion) | RailUK Forums. Some people got so infuriated that they went and sat in the First Class carriages (!) But instead, each agency requires the card user to pay (tap the reader). Also its fare gates are an awful design to boot. It also wants to improve efficiency in order to procure a better rail service for Ile-de-France residents without increasing operating costs. But from a nation that does allows compilation of such statistics: A report by Statistics Denmark released in December 2015 found that 83% of crimes are committed by individuals of Danish origin (88% of the total population), 14% by individuals of non-Western descent and 3% by those of non-Danish Western descent. I then received a letterfrom Tfl saying that I was summoned to court forfare evasion. As far as I understand, in Japan it is common (maybe even law) that the employer pays for the passes of their employees. Regulation Authority, Software Webboston college early decision acceptance rate 2025. Thatcher was pathologically psycho about it. Today I interpret monthly passes a kind of rent-seeking among one group of transit users, who want other people to pay the cost for their transit use. Youll say that one doesnt rule out the other, but it seems that effectively it does. The crime rate of immigrants in those countries is lower than the non-immigrant communities. However, in states such as California -- where cities and transit authorities can choose to make fare evasion a civil violation under Section 99580 of the Public Utilities I already contacted various solicitors over the weekend, and hope to hear from them soon enough. He was just pointing out a common activist position on transit in the United States. One could envision that stationing 1 officer / entry watching for fare evasion should bring that fare evasion down to nearly 0 regardless of types of gates, as well as put a significant dent at crime since anyone chased out of the system can quickly be apprehended. Why is pay as you go more popular?? https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2019/11/public-transportation-security-safety-laws-protests-equity/602212/ @Alon That is the sensible way to do it. (I did turnstile-jump in Paris once, with a valid transfer ticket that the turnstile rejected, I think because Pariss turnstile and magnetic ticket technology is antediluvian.) Fares arent the only source of revenue for the MTA; the system also earns money from tolls, taxes, government subsidies, and advertisements. Not at all equivalent. Ill try and post some of the tweets John Bull made about fare evasion when talking to Second Avenue Subways. In fact, the UKs disaster of rail privatisation saw much higher subsidy from central government than before privatisation! Wedged in overcrowded carriages, fellow passengers suffer panic attacks. But no other American city has that excuse. Heres (below) the usual b.s. I can only think you are British because this is the kind of logic by which they run their transit. According to the present report, there is a common misunderstanding as to what commuting really is and how it should be accounted for. In particular off-peak travel could be way cheaper with price differentiation, and would definitely have a progressive social impact. It also occurs when While commuting time is always going to stop people from living too far away, I cant see how lowering commuting costs isnt going to push a lot of people further out than they currently are. I read that even Japan (an extreme case obviously) wants to blame Chinese immigrants for a rise in crime (linked to criminal syndicates, they claim) which may or may not be true but reveals the cultural attitude behind the phenomenon. Look at the fare compliance b.s. Its not the far right or the far left, can we please keep these terms for the most radical 10-20% of the population on each side rather than for anodyne center-left and center-right politics? Locked (England) Hi, I got a fare evasion summoning me to court, and Id like to know if theres a possible out of court I didnt understand this the first time I read it. 3) The San Francisco stations have public areas before the gates.